They outline the step-by-step process of the evaluation and are often accompanied by worksheets, diagrams and other premade tools. Your evaluation tool should reflect the overall objective of your evaluation and the indicators you are trying to measure. Detailing process lends itself to qualitative tools while large-scale aggregate efficiency evaluations need quantitative tools.
Many evaluations will require a mixed-methods approach utilizing quantitative and qualitative tools to satisfy an array of audiences.
We readily welcome suggestions for improving and updating the criteria as technologies continue to evolve. We will continue to add effective tools once we have the chance to evaluate them. Please also share with tools you see having a positive impact in the field. Proven Effectiveness. User Experience. Is the tool enjoyable and used effectively by the intended audience to meet their goals?
Is the solution set up to give you the data you need in a sustainable way and are you clear and comfortable with the privacy policies? Are you confident that the vendor will continue to exist and provide needed support and updates to the product for the period of time you may need it? About Contact Us. Tool Evaluation Criteria. Proven Effectiveness Is there evidence that this technology can help meet your goals?
Effectiveness What evidence exists to prove effectiveness of the tool? The Guide For Educator s describes the types of evidence used in evaluating educational technologies. To what extent does this evidence suggest that the tool could help meet your specific goals? What other organizations have leveraged the tool effectively, and what factors are different or similar to yours setting, types of users, goals for using product, etc. Given past performance, what outcomes can we expect and over what period of time?
Accessibility Is the Technology accessible and easy to use for all learners? Ease of Use Is the tool built with best practices in usability to maximize ease of use, learnability of the tool, effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction?
How much training, if any, will the user need to be able to use the tool effectively? Most foundations care a great deal about whether their money was well spent, and they often require some form of evaluation to determine whether your approach worked, and how it could be improved. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Evaluation can be a simple, do-it-yourself process, or a full-scale, professional study.
The choice of how to evaluate a project or program is usually determined by:. All you need to do is ask for proposals, pick the one you like best, and pay the bills. Your evaluator does the rest.
Most project evaluations, however, are do it yourself projects that require some careful planning and thinking.
Tools come in two groups; the best known are quantitative tools, which measure how many, how much, how big, and so forth. In some cases, quantitative tools are all you need, because your project has simple, measurable goals, and your nonprofit CRM has got all the. Typically, these are the straightforward projects that aim to lower or increase something easily measured.
For example: increase grades; decrease addiction; increase employment; decrease homelessness. Did it work? To find out, just measure rates within your target audience before and after your program was implemented.
MEASURE Evaluation developed these evaluation tools with the goal of maximizing program results through the systematic collection and analysis of information and evidence about health program performance and impact. Filed under: Evaluation.
Navigation Resources. Navigation Tools. We create tools and approaches for rigorous evaluations, providing evidence to address health challenges.
0コメント